TODD L LEVITT, Consequences of Refusing a Chemical Test during DUI Investigation, Mt. Pleasant, MI DUI Lawyer, May 21, 2012, News
Consequences of Refusing a Chemical Test during DUI Investigation
Implied Consent Law: If arrested for a drunk driving offense in Michigan, all drivers are considered to have given their consent to take a chemical test to determine your bodily alcohol content (BAC).
Purpose: The immediate purpose of the ‘implied consent law’ is to obtain the best evidence of blood alcohol content at the time of the arrest of the person; the long range purpose is, of course, to prevent intoxicated persons from driving on the highways.
Facts: An individual is driving South on Mission St., Mt. Pleasant, MI, and is stopped by a police officer. A DUI investigation is conducted; the driver will be first asked to provide a proof a license, registration, and insurance. Next, it is typical of an officer to ask if the driver had consumed any alcohol prior to operating the motor vehicle; the driver will then be asked to step out of the vehicle to perform a number of sobriety tests. Additionally, if the officer believes that the driver is intoxicated, he/she will ask the driver to submit to a Preliminary Breath Test (PBT). Once the driver is placed under arrest, he/she, in addition to the PBT, will be asked to submit to a chemical test; either blood or breath.
Ramifications: A first refusal results in a one-year suspension and the second or subsequent refusal in seven years results in a two-year suspension, six points are entered on the person’s driving record. A person who refuses the police officer’s request to take a chemical test has his or her picture license confiscated and is issued a temporary permit. MCL 257.625g(1). The nature of the permit will explicitly put an individual on notice that a test has allegedly been refused. The individual will then have 14 days from the date of the arrest to request a hearing. MCL 257.625f(1). Failure to do so results in an automatic one- or two-year suspension depending on the individual’s driving record.
With regard to refusal to submit to an evidentiary chemical test (breathalyzer), a hearing shall only cover the following issues set forth in MCL 257.625f:
1) Whether the peace officer had reasonable grounds to believe that Petitioner had committed a crime described in section 625c(1).
2) Whether Petitioner was placed under arrest for a crime described in section 621c(1).
3) Whether Petitioner was advised of the rights under section 625a(6).
4) Whether Petitioner unreasonably refused to submit to the test upon the request of the peace officer.
The peace officer has the initial burden to establish these issues while the Petitioner has the burden to prove and affirmative defense to a refusal, pursuant to 1999 MR9 R 257.310. The standard of proof is “preponderance of the evidence”. Under MCL 257.319b and 625f, after considering the evidence presented, the Hearing Officer will either impose a suspension/revocation of the license/operation privilege and all CDL endorsements, or take no licensing action. The Hearing Officer cannot issue a restricted license or work permit.
2) If officer fails to appeal, charges will be dismissed.
3) First time offenders can petition the Circuit Court for their restricted license.
Central Michigan Lawyer, Todd L. Levitt, has been representing individuals with suspended driver’s licenses’ for more than 18 years. Todd L. Levitt is considered to be one of the top attorneys in this area of law.
For a free consultation, call (989) 772-6000.
Written by: Adam Finn
View By Topic98.5 WUPS The Todd L.Levitt Law Show ABA Journal Adam Finn Central Michigan Lawyer CMU Student Lawyer Domestic Violence Drivers' License Restoration Drug Crimes Drunk Driving DUI DWI Expungement Fifth Amendment Fleeing and Eluding Home Invasion Hosting a Nusiance Party HYTA Impaired Driving Landlord Tenant LSAT marijuana Medical Marijuana Michigan Drivers License Restoration Lawyer Michigan Drivers License Restoration Lawyer Todd Levitt Michigan Drivers Restoration Lawyer Todd Levitt Michigan out of State Drivers License Restoration Lawyer MIP Mip's Miranda Rights Mount Pleasant Michigan Lawyer Northern Michigan Lawyer Nusiance Party OWI Personal Protection Order Police Possession of Marijuana PPO Pre-Law Q&A Retail Fraud Search and Seizure Student Code of COnduct Student Rights Todd Levitt Traffic Accidents down
- Miranda v. Arizona, TODD LEVITT, CMU, Central Michigan Student Lawyer, Possession of Marijuana
- The Fourth Amendment , Stop & Frisk, Seizure, Arrest, CMU Students, TODD LEVITT
- Cellphone use banned for anyone driving on a level 1 or level 2 graduated driver license in Michigan , TODD LEVITT, March 27th 2013
- CMU, What is A Security Deposit? When Does Landlord Have to Return it? TODD LEVITT, Central Michigan Lawyer
- What happens if I get an MIP in Mount Pleasant Michigan ? TODD LEVITT, CMU, March 18th 2013
- Central Michigan University, Controlled Substance, Alcohol, Student Code of Conduct, TODD LEVITT, Possession of Marijuana
- Joint and Several Liability Lease V. Individual Liability Lease, Mount Pleasant Michigan, CMU, TODD LEVITT
- If you are charged with an MIP in Mount Pleasant Michigan you have a number of options: TODD LEVITT
- CMU STUDENTS, Definitions and Consequences of Drinking and Driving Offenses in The State of Michigan, TODD LEVITT
- Mount Pleasant, Michigan Lawyer Todd Levitt, Possession of Marijuana, DUI, Soaring Eagle Casino & Resort
- Driver’s License Restoration,TODD LEVITT, CENTRAL MICHIGAN, DUI, Possession of Marijuana, March 7th 2013
- CMU Student Lawyer, Todd Levitt, Mount Pleasant Lawyer, March 5th 2013, Drug-Sniffing Dogs, News
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- October 2009
- September 2009
- January 1999
Connect with us